An addiction is defined as something that is external, very difficult to get rid off; nevertheless.
There are no good or bad addictions. An addiction is just what it is — “An unnecessary relationship.”
Addiction says that you need something. Need is the first addiction. Whatever you claim that you need that is your first addiction.
That which begins as ignorance and dreams, cannot end as understanding.
Why can’t my response to a situation arise directly of my out of my intelligence? Why do I need an ideal? Why do I need an ideal to show me the way? Why do you need to give me ideals? Don’t I have the power to understand? And can’t my action come out of my own power? Why do I need the support of an ideal? Why?
Every course of action and its opposite course of action both are alright in a different situation. So, how can there be an ideal response?
Your very fundamental core value is ‘Clarity’ except that there is no core values.
Ideals obfuscate ‘clarity.’ So, anybody who will have ideals as core values will find that he is missing out on clarity. That clarity has also been given the name of ‘emptiness.’ Emptiness because it is clear, clear of everything. It is empty. That is the only core value. A little ahead that core value takes the shape of a few other core values. They are called Truth, Joy, Love, Freedom.
When you follow even without understanding, that is Surrender.
That is what Surrender is. You do not know what the whole thing is about and yet there is something that tells you, to just go along with it.
AP: You have a beautiful body; how will you use it to make people come to you?
L: Display it.
AP: Now look at Mahavir and Lalla. If you want people to listen to you, they must first of all be present in front of you. Why not attract them this way?
Stories have no use, in fact, those stories must be dropped, after a point. After a point, if you are really wise, you will see the foolishness and the falseness of those stories.
L: Why are Miracles added to all the stories?
AP: We need them.
Otherwise, who would believe in poor Jesus.
Read the complete article: Acharya Prashant on a Sufi story: The obvious falseness of our stories
Do you love from the heart? And if you love from the heart then you’ll not really come to know that you love. Man is strange, his take is more in knowing, knowing as in ascertaining, validating, certifying. Man’s take is more in certifying than in getting. It is as if a hungry man wants to be certified that he is full. He does not want food, he wants the certificate that he is…Full.
If a hungry man does that you’ll call him just mad. But that is what the entire mankind has been constantly doing. When you are hungry, we do not look for the real thing- the food. We look for certification, the thought, the inner validation that we are full. You do not look for love, you look for impressions of love, you look for behavior that confirms one’s images of love.
Do we seriously want love? No. Do we seriously want innocence? No. We want behavior that looks like love. We want behavior that looks like innocence. And if from a loving heart, behavior comes to us that does not comply with our images and expectations of love, we go as far as to say that this is not love and love at all. We say, “This fellow, is not love,” because he loves only when he comes to me with such and such behavioral patterns. Only when he smiles at me would I agree that he loves. Only when he gifts me, Only when he says sweet things to me, would I say that he loves.”
We don’t have love. We have stuff that looks like love. If we don’t get that stuff we feel severely disappointed.
We don’t know innocence. We have images of innocence.
Read the complete article: We don’t want love, we want behavior that looks like love
Spirituality is no abstract subject. When it is said that it comes from something that you can never know, from where the words of the Upanishads came, from where all the divine revelations came, you interpret it as meaning that they must be coming from a very esoteric source, some really deeply hidden source. Yes? Is that not the interpretation? But allow me to open it up a little more for you-if it is not already opened to the maximum. It is said that the Upanishads come from a source that you cannot know, because the Upanishads really come from nowhere.
For something to come from anywhere, the source must be at a distance from you. The source must be at least a little inaccessible, a little away, requiring a little effort to reach. But when, the happening is so obvious, then you cannot say that it has come from anywhere. The Upanishads come from nowhere, meaning-what the Upanishads are saying is just obvious, is just so simple. So what to say from where they come? They are like the palm of your hand. It is simpler to know Upanishads than to know your thumb, your nails, the back of your hand.
If you can pay attention to your slippers, I assure you that they will reveal to you, the scriptures.
Read the complete article: Living in facts versus living in thoughts
When you say that it is possible to challenge the false, then your life has to be a proof of that challenge. And when you come up to people not only with your words but with the backing of your life, then people appreciate it, then you are credible. Otherwise, you are just talking.
So, it has to begin with you. First of all, you have to be that who can be the messenger; who can be the Teacher.
In repeating the knowledge, you are only perpetuating misery because they already have a lot of knowledge.
And do you know what happens if you are not living what you are saying?
Then you produce more and more cynicism in people. people say, “Another one from the fake ones and because I see only the fake ones hence it is proven that Truth does not exist.” So, instead of being a teacher of Truth, you become a messenger or rather a proof of the false.
To read the complete article: Do you know the most dominant religion today?